Audirvana vs hqplayer. For DSD playback but also for FLAC.
Audirvana vs hqplayer I know. At least not Sox as it is implemented in Volumio, Audirvana and everywhere else I've tried upsampling. Thank you so much for your advices. So, I downloaded the studio trial. Hi, using Audirvana 3. And regardless of the quality of the DAC, HQPlayer provides a great playback, even with the most expensive DACs. com so I can check reproduce this on my side? Audirvana Audirvāna 3. No problems trying Audirvana Origin and keeping your A3. As mentioned I can compare both Roon and Audirvana playing direct to HQPlayer, over the network. The guys from Roon are very smart. I will run a trial with your choices above. I have a JRMC25 master license, but it mostly collects dust these days. It is simply better than HQP NAA and Roon. 5. Tracks from my pc server, neutron decoding to PCM UPnP to my allo usbridge SIG. Also I think that AS has clipping problems when using upsampling. It has For example, Audirvana supports the execution of high-performance algorithms to download the DAC and avoid oversampling. Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. I Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. 1. The two players sound similar, but not t I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. Doudou June 12, 2021, 12:01pm 301. Hello guys, My boss is a one year user of Audirvana. Another thing that lead me to leaving was a lack of album integrity - lots of albums show up as a mix of HD and UltraHD tracks when the album was never been released as I’ve spent almost a month now, trying to decide between subscriptions to Amazon Music HD or Qobuz streamed through Audirvana. I have Audirvana 3. I could not believe that, and after many AB testing, that was the case. I do own and regularyly employ Amarra Symphony with iRC (ASwiRC), and recently purchased a life-time license to roon and almost immediately thereafter Dirac Live, +1 for me. So AS has its pluses for me, unless it’s too expensive. Just out of curiosity, why is it you’d prefer not to use HQPlayer Embedded and UPnP/DLNA I did not have problems with crackling - only when using Kernel Mode (W10) and upsampling with r8brain (witch for me is the best of AS) I had problems when skipping tracks with different resolutions. All the SACDs and the DSD tracks are mastered from the PCM master of the mix. For DSD playback but also for FLAC. Another disqualification. At that time, I had Roon Core and HQPlayer on the same Mac mini 2018. First time user of Roon+HQPlayer. But this is my own taste. 5, decide which you prefer and go for your preference. So that may play into the decision whether or not to support it (though I of course can’t speak for Audirvana). Same for me. In terms of sound quality, it reminds me a lot of HQPlayer, very smooth and agreeable. Exactly the same way as you select your Hi-Fi equipment. I tried all the players I spoke about, and bought a license for all of them, except Roon. Have been extensively testing HQPlayer vs. Did you try it on a Mac or on a PC (Windows)? sandsOfArrakis July 9, 2021 The Audirvana screenshot is about PCM to DSD cause I couldn’t get it to do re-sampling of DSD. How do Roon I’ve been using Audirvana for two years, about the the sound quality it is the best player. By the end of trial will definitely buy it. 5, Audirvana studio test period, Roon, foobar, jriver 26, Amarra luxe, hqplayer desktop, jplay and fidelizer pro. You commented a 3 weeks old post, and I don’t understand what you’re saying. It integrates with Roon, but with this integration, there is a perdition of the quality of sound. SSD drives are still very expensive, so I converted progressively during the last years my DSD files to DSF-WV, and with Covid-19 confinement I had plenty of time to I have Neutron on my android and tbh barely use it, just because I find it too clunky to navigate. The user experience on Part 1. HQPlayer simply sounds more 'processed' or hifi like vs my favored Roon only setup. 5 vs roon/roon + hqplayer. Just starting the software was buggy as hell. HQPlayer I spent a week comparing JRiver upsampling to HQPlayer and as said before it's no match compared to HQPlayer. Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. Coojee July 8, 2021, 1:55pm 374. Audirvana has always been rock solid with Qobuz. Since my old I agree. Amarra 3 vs. Posted May 12, 2016. Just want a plug and play solution with HQPlayer is an offline player with no Tidal or Qobuz integration, but it allows the music from Roon to be played over to HQPlayer. 2. Roon has another advantage, it can integrate with HQPlayer’s resampling which I find better than Audirvana 3’s upsampling algorithm. I love testing these stuff hahaha. lucretius July 8, 2021, 3:13pm 376. For me, it’s a big letdown – you can’t even focus on composer by name so that only favourites will show Don’t forget neither AS nor Roon or HQPlayer will turn your midfi stereo in a high end system . Studio. 5 and J Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. have to say this is very good player UI is very clear to use. Actually, that’s not Hi, i own Audirvana 3. Other tracks did not have the placement weirdness, although they did have the rich overlay to the sound. Verdict: If you're in the market for a new music player, you might want to consider purchasing Hysolid. I did not understand completely all what you said, but I’m afraid that you are messing different things. Doudou July 8, 2021, 3:11am 344. So for me, the subscription was not justified. Derek July 9, 2021, 4:51am I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. Tuneman July 9, 2021, 2:43pm 407. It can downsample, for instance, CD quality tracks from a Hi Res master. So what is the difference: 10% to 15% more detail that is masked with Roon. HQPlayer, compared to Roon, has better upsampling algorithm. For Roon itself, compared to Foobar or Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. I think I did both. NAA does give 5% better but cannot match Audirvana, and not worth the Is there anyone who can help me understand the Sox/R8Brain upsampling options? I battled my way through the “info” button on the settings page and still couldn’t see when Don't know how it uses ram but I wish it could flush the full song to ram and play back from there with high system priority. HQPlayer does amazing things to music when upsampling PCM. The two I compared are UPNP apps so the renderer (HQPlayer OS in my comparison) is doing all the work and the result is a native feed. I have read some post that Audirvana still not up to DSD 1024 expect we have outside source like USD I’m wondering if Audirvana will up to DSD 1024 system in the near future. I’ve dropped the Roon subscription, it will expire in June. But the price was high, and I was not satisfied at all with the SQ that I was getting from Roon’s integration with HQPlayer. 5 / Roon / Qobuz vanilla were very very little. 5 version at the same time. 99) 5. For me, it’s a big letdown – you can’t even focus on composer by For only 2. Try the integration of Roon and HQplayer with MinimServer. 5, which is great and even superior to Roon or Roon + HQPlayer, but under these conditions I ask myself: why, oh god, why would I adopt AS if it is sounding almost identical to its older HQPlayer is derivate from a professional mastering application for sound production that was not intended to serve as a music player. Agoldnear January 9, 2024, 3:27pm 46. 8k Junior Member Posted May 12, 2016. For this and After trying a lot Since Many Years Neutron music player it s the best choice. HQPlayer also sounds great, but has a terrible GUI and library system. In your experience, am I going to lose sound quality dramatically if I just go for the combo streamer/DAC (like my original Bluesound node 2i idea?) and maybe forget about using Audirvana?--- I did Origin, Audirvana. With Audirvāna, enjoy all your streaming and local music with the best playback sound quality from a computer. Today I tested Audirvana Studio and to my immense amazement, the sound is not the same. I have the Holo May NOS DAC and HQPlayer really took it to another level. HQPlayer Pro does not have reduced functionality. I will look into this. First impression for whatever reason I don't get, audirvana plus 2. I didn’t realise there was a windows version, so trying out now. Followers 0. Doudou August 19, 2021, 11:48am 548. 5 and Audirvana Origin installed on the same Windows machine without any problems. And he has subcribed Audirvana Origin version. For me, Audirvana sounds good, but to my ears it’s not the best. On my setting playing via an allo usbridge SIG running gentooplayer, the best sounding player IS neutron on my Android phone. This app also supports VST3 plug-ins. 1. Whether The original release version, AS 1. Derek July 9, 2021, 4:51am HQPlayer, actually its full name is HQPlayer Desktop, is an audiophile player that is a derivative of a professional mastering application that is used in the musical industry, and whose name is HQPlayer Pro. To my ears, A+, HQP and Roon - for instance - have a digital edge to their sound that I find If you plan to use Audirvana in conjunction with HQPlayer, you need HQPlayer Embedded. Sound quality is an entirely subjective and personal experience dependent upon your ears and brains response to signals from the ears. Around ten months back, I moved to Audirvana Studio. sandsOfArrakis August 5, 2021, Audirvana plays all the formats you mentioned, but it does not support a very useful format which is DSF-WV, while Foobar, JRiver, HQPlayer , Roon and even VOX or Collibri, all support it very well. Derek July 9, 2021, 4:48am 388. No comparison. Audirvana will connect via UPnP HQPlayer has various high sampling and high quality sampling algorithms, as well as noise selection, noise modulation and modulator algorithms. By very far, Audirvana. Euphony can also accommodate Roon under its own OS. ledones July 7, 2021, 1:46pm 324. It has simply no headroom management and volume is not turned down somehow automatically. When I connect my MacBook to my OPPO BDP-105’s USB interface, Audirvana 3 sounds better. Try the I tried this software for a week and now I am proud owner of Neutron for Windows, Audirvana 3. Recommended Posts. I find it sounds a little better HQPlayer is, for better or worse, far more complicated than Audirvana and uses its own system. The HQPlayer UI is so bad, it seems like a command line interface would be more user-friendly. For me, it’s a big letdown – you can’t even focus on composer by name so that Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. The HQPlayer developer’s software is also used in the Holo May DAC (I believe). X. 5 or Roon orAfter if you are searching for a most analog sounding player Hqplayer desktop. Which I’m able to with foobar2000 and HQPlayer. This mastering application costs some €3. AS sounds so much clearer here compared to Roon. Download: Audirvana ($119. Audirvana is a media player software designed especially for music listening enthusiasts and audiophiles looking for a music player that can handle high-fidelity digital audio and top-notch audio Hi, i own Audirvana 3. One album I have been comparing with Roon (because not loaded it on AS yet) and I Thanks Stefano. except for HQPlayer. There are lots of pro’s and cons with upsampling in software (music player program on a pc) vs hardware (DAC). I m first a music lover. Roon as well. I have already posted some comments on why I bought HQPlayer in the forums, so I will not rehash old thoughts. Roon has integration with HQPlayer there are API HQPlayer made available for any 3rd party to integrate, which is why I thought it's a low effort no brainier addition to increase the I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. So, for me, two reasons to choose an audioplayer on a computer : quality sound and stability. Audirvana and HQPlayer have both a similar higher quality DSD output than native on my DAC. The spinning ball and the crackles were not due to the fact that the files were on the USB-Key. The rub with HQPlayer is that the user interface is antiquated and clunky, thus needs Roon for the front end. My Dell has a Nvidia GPU with 4 GB memory. Just started the 3 months Amazon HD trial, and the Ultra HD quality, if passed through Audirvana, would be better or on par with my current Tidal/MQA, that I would immediately decommission for Amazon Ultra 20€/m vs 12€ plus an easier integration with all my home Alexas, and real time lyrics Please Audirvana Hi everyone, I havent sleep this last days trying to answer this question, im sending my music via UPNP from audirvana to my amp Hegel h190, also i have a mconnect that is far more easy and the navigation is faster and Audirvana Audirvana Studio vs Roon. It works perfectly on my setup, the sound is excellent, though no better than A3. Windows vs Mac is always a touchy subject here - religion and all that. When using bit-perfect (without any changes of the original) I call this ‘vanilla’ - the differences between A 3. $150 Canadian for probably years. I really should make a decision as to which one to keep because paying for both seems pretty silly. The sound was not as good as when HQPlayer played alone. It seems like his laptop can run to DSD 512 itself. I'm starting this thread to document my attempts to get SoX to deliver better results. I see some discussion on HQPlayer here, so I am going to throw in my 2 cents. I also made many of my friends buy it as a good solution. I know, I can use a dedicated server for Roon, HQPlayer, blah blah blah, but I don’t want to spend more money and complicate my life. Better than AS or Audirvana 3. No difference is sound quality in my Audirvana does sound better than Roon on its own, and if you're happy with the Audirvana experience, there's no need to pay extra for Roon. HQPlayer has a remote control, HQPD control, that sweetens a bit, I stress a bit, its unbelievably spartan looking UI! Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. I own both - 2 Macbook pros with Audirvana and 2 windows PCs with the likes of Audiophile Optimizer, HQplayer, Jplay and JRiver, Roon, Fidelizer. reddog1 July 8, 2021, 10:03am 357. Derek July 9, 2021, 4:48am #388. One of the things I heard about HQPlayer is that the player is optimized for the I also use iFi Micro iDSD Black Label. 0 everything is sounding too much like Audirvana 3. reddog1 July 7, 2021, 4:32pm 326. Suffice to say that a lot of people enjoy to use ‘audiophile’ software (like Audirvana, HQPlayer, Roon, 🚧 This post is a wiki! If you’re good with HQPlayer, feel free to edit it, especially since I won’t know the configuration for everyone’s use case! 🚧 I spent some time learning how to do the HQPlayer thing recently, so I thought I’d start a community guide! If you’ve been thinking about getting into HQPlayer, but you’ve been confused by all the filter choices and whatnot, I I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. For four months, I have just been using Audirvana. I suggest you try to search for ‘Audirvana vs Roon’ on Google and a lot of information comes up. It’s impossible to know unless you try it. 1 Like. I discovered also an ugly Russian player with a horrible UI, that sounds better than most of the players, including Audirvana. I discovered also an ugly Russian player with a horrible UI, that For me, Audirvana sounds good, but to my ears it’s not the best. By bobbmd May 12, 2016 in Networking, Networked Audio, and Streaming. HQPlayer’s playback of DSD is superior by far, and is quite better for PCM. Sources were local files and DLNA shares, and AFAIR the target Tried HQPlayer last night, aside from it not loading many of my files, it seems to only want to play certain bitrates - is that correct? -, I don think I noticed any difference in SQ, Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. Utterly worth it. The two players sound similar, but not t I’ve trialed Amarra Luxe. Audirvana is another option that isn't cheap (there is a 30-day free trial), but the sheer power of the app may make it a price worth paying. 5 vs roon/roon + hqplayer IGNORED audirvana plus 2. How many Cuda cores? Doudou September 7, 2021, 7:48pm 905. Doudou: HQPlayer, actually its full name is HQPlayer Desktop, is an audiophile player that is a derivative of a professional mastering application that is used in the musical industry, FYI, I used Roon for many years with and without HQPLAYER and have a lifetime subscription. lucretius September 7, 2021, 7:46pm 904. The same Hello @bnbayer, Can you send me this track in particular at support@audirvana. In my setup I prefer running Roon sans HQPlayer in 'bridged' mode, where Roon core is on the custom server, Roon Endpoint on my OpticalRendu streamer. I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. I have 2 AS subs instead. 0, on my system, which responds very well to upsampling, blew me away. 5 with Win10 and external DAC audiolab M-DAC (not the newer plus version) via USB which works perfect for me. Doudou July 7, 2021, 6:45pm #338. Got one question is there any difference between trial and paid version? In a list of features it say “full access to origin features “ Thanks WASAPI on Audirvana & Foobar, I’m not entirely sure the mode I was using on Neutron. Only solution is to try both AS and 3. How do you think HQPlayer can be used with Audirvana? Jud January 15, 2024, 10:59pm 69. Agoldnear January 15, 2024, 10:58pm 68. And it didn’t even work normally. But I tried it with an old version of Roon, Hi, i m totally agree with doudou. That is when I started using Audirvana to stream Qobuz. But then you get a Roonish sound signature that is less pleasing in my opinion than the Stylus player. I'm currently using Tidal+ Audirvana. JRiver sounds good, but I never cared for it’s GUI either. dotnet July 8, 2021, Worse than HQPlayer? I find that difficult to imagine. Sailor July I agree! I have have compared Roon into HQPlayer OS vs Audirvana & JPlay iOS into HQPlayer OS and the latter always come out on top for sound quality. 5 vs Origin ( Mac) Origin. One can be a music lover without being an audiophile. However, you will find agreement from most, that having Audirvana/r8Brain or SoX do the conversion, is the right thing to do, in order to remove the processing overhead from the DAC platform, so to give it the best I've always had issues with Qobuz crashing and skipping on the desktop app. Peers to winyl are xmplay, musicbee and hqplayer both of which sound almost identical at identical settings. Roon was set to hand over the stream to HQPlayer that, in turn, streamed to my RAspberry Pi 4 running RopieeeXL, with the NAA module activated. Tried My experience with Amazon HD before I discontinued was that most of the time it would stream at the advertised rate but not always, and it was never predictable as to when it would or not. Amazon Music HD sounds terrific and it’s . 5 with I do think Audirvana is better if your DAC’s USB interface isn’t very good in handling jitter. Same as JRiver will not sound the same or that being said, Audirvana now only offers a subscription-based product (Audirvana Studio) and has removed the old Audirvana 3. NAA, the HQPlayer analog to UPnP/DLNA, is not. Doudou July 7, 2021, 1:42pm 323. I do not refer to reviews. 5 version until I have time to implement my Love threads like this onean impossible question to answer. I don’t have Roon to compare to AS. Nearly a day of testing media players! Thanks for everyone’s There’s an Arab proverb that says: “On taste and smell, it’s impossible to discuss”. lucretius July 9, 2021, 3:16pm 408. Another thing to consider is the music library of each service. I Hi all Im new to Audirvana and currently running Origin on mac m1. HQPlayer does not integrate with Audirvana. I also chose not to upgrade Audirvana Plus to V. And HQPlayer sounds more natural than Audirvana. I will run a trial with your I have noticed that Audirvana tends to use standards, and UPnP/DLNA is a standard, however much abused. Since version 1. Those two together come to $950 if bought straight out. Beats most of what I’ve heard. lucretius July 9, 2021, 3:43am 387. 000. Doudou July 6, I remember when Qobuz beta came out and their own player was buggy, often stuttering or locking up. Thank you There is also a lot of information on Google. Although Audirvana hides information where music files are At first I was amazed of the AS SQ but after some weeks and checking A-B again vs A 3. Let’s see. Audirvana can not integrate HQPlayer. 0. They know that their player does not sound best, so they created a feature to integrate HQPlayer to I have have compared Roon into HQPlayer OS vs Audirvana & JPlay iOS into HQPlayer OS and the latter always come out on top for sound quality. This is one of the best Hi Res music player programs available on the market. Running a Mac mini M1 and an SMSL Sanskrit III to an 845 single ended trios amp. Coojee July 7, 2021, 2:38pm 325. That acknowledged, to me there seems to be a noticeable audio quality difference between them. You may get even a better sound. To be fair, I did not see that as a negative, but it didn’t work too well with my Mojo & 1840 headphones. HQPlayer is, for better or worse, far more complicated than Audirvana and uses its own system. They have since fixed their own player but I still prefer Audirvana:) Amazon Music HD only works in Windows shared mode and regardless of the When I tried Roon, I did it very seriously, and I took my time to check every detail of the application. Roon sounds just as good with I agree, Audirvana has a great interface, and I do use it for certain types of music. When I tried Roon I HQPlayer sounds much better when it plays alone, without Roon. Doudou September 7, 2021, 7:45pm 903. Plus I live in a small apartment, don’t have too much space. And even though I Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. Why 2 subs? I have 2 setups, so I don’t have to log in/out all the time while in the living room or in my office/game room. 2 Likes. Good sound, no trouble. Euphony can also be combined with HQPlayer, but I never really managed to get it working reliably. Euphony has the ability to run HQPlayer inside Roon in both 30 minute free trials or purchased full version. The user experience on the others pales in comparison to Roon. image 1380×690 188 KB. Embellishing on the value of a clean power-signal for the entire system and the audible ramifications of a harmonically balanced reference power-signal in all components of the playback system, I have found great value in utilizing the ADD- But the price was high, and I was not satisfied at all with the SQ that I was getting from Roon’s integration with HQPlayer. Excellent choice, I listen to a lot of AIR as well. Umm, in the way the Audivarna + Hqplayer Desktop - Studio - Audirvana. Audirvana now for months. Peers to winyl are xmplay, musicbee and hqplayer The Audiophile Optimizer tweaked Windows 10 running Roon into HQPlayer now surpasses Euphony Stylus to my ears. What is Audirvana. In the Audirvana vs Qobuz thread, I guess all there is to say is that if you think that Audirvana sounds better than Qobuz’ default player, it’s the Qobuz winner. DGrigorescu July 7 Audirvana with DMG Audio plug in EQuick is one that I use. Which added up are just slightly more expensive compared to a single Roon license. All three are much better and less 'buggy' than Amarra sQ+/PureMusic. SoX does not. Angelos58 July 9, 2024, 12:07pm 8. If you already paid for the Audirvana license i think it would make sense keep using the software with qobuz or tidal integration. 5 from their website. It is admittedly hard to A/B the results, I am happy with Qobuz via Wi-Fi to Audirvana 3. Euphony can also be combined with Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. 5 and Roon I am disappointed. The most important question (for me) is what sounds best? And the answer is: AS. You can run HQP Embedded on a separate computer, or as I did, on a Raspberry Pi 4B. Although not intending to purchase AS, I have been trialling it. Your experience may vary. bobbmd. I am also sure I have barely scratched the surface of what it can do. Does Audirvana Studio sound better than 3. But the OP said that he was trying to get into comparing local files vs streaming via Qobuz. Brio by OraStream. HQPlayer Pro does not write only DSD, but also PCM. dotnet July 8, 2021, 4:49am 347. You can not run them both at the same time (you have to close 3. 5 ? VoyagerDude, I all the tests, with the three players, I played the same files from the same USB-Key. Kazuki June 12, 2021, 11:09am 300. But How do you think HQPlayer can be used with Audirvana? Audirvana Audirvana Studio vs Roon. 5 first before you run Origin and vice versa), but that is the only thing I noticed. Euphony sounds quite good when you play via its own player called Stylus. The interface of AS is full of bugs and SQ is somehow artificial. From what I remember the sound was pretty good. However, I want to share my recent discovery that some of you may want to try (or not). I will probably keep using the old 3. I had HQPlayer set to pass through, so no upsampling whatsoever (I’m a bit intimidated with the multitude of filters ). Neuton is by no means bad, it’s right up there, I just felt that AS (& Today I tested Audirvana Studio and to my immense amazement, the sound is not the same. fvgil pddor xjmgcyy ygvk exhbjdev fztwa uml rtamny swxw izfwj etb rpxoguu pxs hbxt asvpr